Frontline Fronts for Corporations Not the Public
By Margaret Flowers
It was with a sense of déjà vu that I watched the latest Frontline documentary about health care. “Obama’s Deal” endeavored to reveal the significant influence of health industry dollars on our political process; however, as in Frontline’s Sick Around America, the producers did a disservice by the failure to educate the public about the bigger picture of the health care situation in this nation and the range of possible solutions.
Curiously, just as it was in the health “debate,” single payer, improved Medicare for All, was also excluded from the film. The major point of the influence of health industry dollars on the reform process which should have been mentioned is that these dollars were spent in order to restrict the debate and protect industry profits. The lucrative status quo would have been threatened if single payer had been openly discussed because a publicly-financed national health program can provide high quality universal health care and control health care costs, something that a private insurance based system cannot accomplish.
After watching this film, viewers would have no idea that single payer exists or know that there is a strong movement for it. Considering that there have been attempts to push for a national health program for over 100 years in this nation and that, because of a strong grassroots movement, single payer legislation was nearly introduced on the floor of the House in November and was actually introduced on the floor of the Senate for the first time in this nation last December, the omission appears to be intentional.
Those of us in the single payer movement are accustomed to being censored by the corporate media. The reason for our exclusion is known: health insurance and pharmaceutical corporations advertise heavily on these airwaves and wield considerable power over the programming. This was described clearly by Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting’s August 2009 piece titled “Single-Payer & Interlocking Directorates: The corporate ties between insurers and media companies” by Kate Murphy.
The producers at Frontline carefully cut single payer out of the film. When the host, Mr. Kirk, interviewed me for “Obama’s Deal,” we spoke extensively of the single payer movement and my arrest with other single payer advocates in the Senate Finance Committee last May. However, our action in Senate Finance was then misidentified as “those on the left” who led a “counterattack” because of “liberal outrage” at being excluded.
This occurred despite an email exchange following the release of the preview in which I specifically requested that the producers identify that we are a nonpartisan group fighting for single payer: a health reform model based on evidence of what is effective here and abroad and on health policy principles. This mischaracterization unfortunately mirrors the way in which the health industry has portrayed the single payer movement (verified by Wendell Potter, a former Cigna executive).
“Obama’s Deal” contained a segment on those who oppose health reform, but nowhere were single payer advocates given a chance to explain their proposal or motivations. Neither was it noted that the hatred and fear seen at the summer Town Halls and that factored in the election of Scott Brown were assisted by the stealth organizing efforts of ultra-conservative Dick Armey of FreedomWorks and others.
We have the resources in this nation to achieve the same high quality health outcomes and health security that exist in other advanced nations. One reason for our failure is the intentional misinformation and omission of information in corporate media. Our public media does a disservice by leaving out the full picture of our broken political process, its effect on the health and economic wellbeing of our people and the truth of what we can achieve.
Margaret Flowers, MD is a pediatrician who serves as the Congressional Fellow for Physicians for National Health Program.
Subscribe to News and Reports
User login
Navigation
Recent comments
- Take Action
- Unemployment not eased by government money advancements
- The debate on Health-care
- Healthcare law will have key provisions starting September 23
- The number one thing he had
- That is exactly what people
- The nature of capitalism is
- Unemployment is the main
- healthcare in general
- Everyone is a subject
Comments
"Whose Team Won?"
From the 4/9 PNHP newsletter: "Dr. Margaret Flowers will appear on PBS' 'Frontline' program titled 'Obama's Deal' next Tuesday. Although we have only seen a limited preview of the segments featuring Dr. Flowers, including footage of her arrest at the Senate Finance Committee last May, it would appear that her participation, and the participation of other critics of the role of the big health insurers, will be substantial."
Contrary to PNHP's hopes, coverage of leftist criticism of ObamaCare was fleeting, at best. The Teabagger crowds got much more extensive coverage.
This film is much more about whose team won -- D vs. R -- than what is really in the bills and how they will affect people, and how they will further enrich the already rich and powerful.
My biggest problem with this film is its blind acceptance of the Senate's 60-vote threshold to get anything done. NOTHING is said about Harry Reid's immediate power to force true filibustering -- make the R's stand up hour after hour, defending their load of crap to Americans -- hell, the word "filibuster" is never used EVEN ONCE in this film. For more about how the D's, if they'd had anything remotely resembling fortitude, could have dealt with the R's filibuster threat, see the blog post at http://backbonecampaign.org/Blog.cfm?ID=361 .
All in all, this film was a big letdown for me. It's not the first time I've been disappointed by the often-outstanding Frontline series. In my opinion, in most of their programs that fail, it's not because of what they said, it's what they left out altogether.
I have little doubt that the Obama sycophants who wildly engaged in a post-health-care-"reform"-bill-signing party-hearty scream-and-shout "our team won" lovefest will view this documentary as evidence of a great Obama / Democratic Party victory. To me, it's a case history of failure.